> As part of my continuing mission to break all Mirage APIs, I've
> written up some thoughts on how to improve error handling:
> 
>  https://github.com/mirage/mirage-www/pull/274

I'm still like proposition 5 very much, so I've started to see what it could 
look like in practice:

https://github.com/mirage/mirage/pull/383

My plan is to adapt the various libraries needed to run mirage-skeleton on top 
of this. I think it will not be too much painful, mainly because the removal of 
DEVICE.connect means that there is no more DEVICE.id and DEVICE.error to care 
about. I'll keep the list updated on the progress.

While doing this, I've also cleaned up V1 documentation and updated it online: 
http://mirage.github.io/mirage/V1.html

Thomas

> 
> Although written as if it's a final design, it's intended only as a
> starting point for discussion, to find out what we do and don't agree
> on. Please add comments, information about successful approaches
> you've seen, etc.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Dr Thomas Leonard        http://0install.net/
> GPG: 9242 9807 C985 3C07 44A6  8B9A AE07 8280 59A5 3CC1
> GPG: DA98 25AE CAD0 8975 7CDA  BD8E 0713 3F96 CA74 D8BA
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MirageOS-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mirageos-devel


_______________________________________________
MirageOS-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mirageos-devel

Reply via email to