I agree. The network issues are next on my merge list, so I hope to look at this today.
Anil > On 22 Apr 2015, at 11:24, Mindy Preston <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'd recommend a simpler "for now" patch that doesn't alter the underlying > structure so drastically. > >> On 22 April 2015 11:47:19 CEST, Richard Mortier >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 22 April 2015 at 10:21, Magnus Skjegstad <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> - State of the codebase (refresh/testing/releases/etc) >>> >>> The version of Jitsu we used for evaluation has been released and is in >>> mirage-dev, but we have not yet used it to host unikernels on a public >>> server so we will probably discover some new issues when we do that. >>> Anil and Dave are preparing a Xen server where we will test this. >>> >>> Currently Synjitsu requires an older patched TCP/IP stack and the ARP >>> tables are a bit difficult to set up. It would be nice if we could merge >>> the patch into the main stack before NSDI and add a way to configure the >>> ARP tables dynamically, as it would be >>> much easier to install. >> >> Is this something that Mindy's ARP patches would be useful for? Or is >> there a simpler path "for now" so that something is ready by NSDI? > > -- > Composed on a touchscreen keyboard; please forgive typos and brevity. > _______________________________________________ > MirageOS-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mirageos-devel
_______________________________________________ MirageOS-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mirageos-devel
