Le jeudi, 13 août 2015 à 18:59, Amir Chaudhry a écrit : > Packages that we do actually use, but do not maintain, can be revealed by > looking at dependencies so is there a need to also tag them with `mirage`?
You want to use the tag `mirage` with any package that provides specific support for mirage in some way, so that mirage users can browse mirage build blocks in the opam repository. I don't think general purpose pure OCaml libraries should have this tag but those e.g. that expose functors that depend on mirage signatures. Now maybe this tag should be called `mirageos`. Daniel _______________________________________________ MirageOS-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mirageos-devel
