Bah, you're absolutely right, I saw the H and, in my excitement, scrambled the link between eye and brain and concluded that it was the A64/H64, which have arm A53s.
--- Original Message --- From: "Thomas Leonard" <[email protected]> Sent: 27 August 2015 2:08 pm To: "Nick Betteridge" <[email protected]> Cc: "Anil Madhavapeddy" <[email protected]>, "Richard Mortier" <[email protected]>, [email protected] Subject: Re: [MirageOS-devel] Recommended device for MirageOS On 27 August 2015 at 07:01, Nick Betteridge <[email protected]> wrote: > > Definitely recommend the Cubieboard2 or Cubietruck. > > I think that the sunxi development of cubieboard4 has dried up even though > it's marked to be included in the next release. The only issue I've found > with cubieboard2/3 - which is definitely the way to go - is that if you run > the boards with the pre-built images for a long time then the xapi stack > chews up all of the microsd memory by writing a lot to syslog. If you > rebuild the image with the xapi commented out of the build scripts then it > works fine. > > Incidentally, next iteration of cubieboard - 5 - uses the allwinner h8 - > which has the A53's, is 64 bits running arm architecture v8. Do you have a reference for this? According to Wikipedia, the H8 has A7s: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allwinner_Technology#A_and_H-Series (the 8 referring to the number of cores, not the ARM architecture version) -- Dr Thomas Leonard http://roscidus.com/blog/ GPG: DA98 25AE CAD0 8975 7CDA BD8E 0713 3F96 CA74 D8BA _______________________________________________ MirageOS-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mirageos-devel
