Hmm, it seems like that is built on top of a few packages that don't exist any more to interface between Baardskeerder and Mirage.
Do you think it's worth doing a simple B-Tree implementation myself, or would it be better to try and build a new interface module for Mirage and Baardskeerder? A B-Tree implementation would certainly be good for the project write-up, but let me know what you think. Rupert On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 8:58 PM Richard Mortier < [email protected]> wrote: > On 10 November 2015 at 16:49, Rupert Horlick <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm implementing this for a Part II project, so I've decided to go ahead > and > > implement my own simple FS for BLOCK, rather than using IRMIN. > > > > However, I'm coming across the difficulties that Dave mentioned, > > Simple and in-memory is (surely!) still good to start with though! > > > so I'm > > reading up on B-trees as we speak. I may well end up writing a simple > B-tree > > library, so I'll let know you if I do. > > There may be most of such a thing already I think -- Chris Greenhalgh > at Nottingham lashed something up a while ago based on Baardskeerder, > see https://github.com/cgreenhalgh/ocaml-btree (though based on a much > much earlier version of Mirage :) > > -- > Richard Mortier > [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ MirageOS-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mirageos-devel
