Le jeudi, 3 décembre 2015 à 11:18, Thomas Leonard a écrit : > Yes, it would be good to clarify this. My view is that mirage-types > should be for "module types that have been specified/standardised by > the Mirage project". i.e. projects that use these types are more > likely to work together. So mirage-types is the Mirage equivalent of > POSIX.
I think that if mirage aims at being a truly composable and versatile system it should avoid having a notion of POSIX, except as I said for interacting with the hardware. Best, Daniel _______________________________________________ MirageOS-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mirageos-devel
