On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 04:40:03AM -0700, Vladislav Belogrudov wrote:
> I think using grub is shameful and insecure enough :)
> I would not rely on boot loader that resides
> outside of MBR. The best thing for multi-os pc
> is distro-independent loader (e.g. GAG) + partion
> loaders for each specific OS. 
> 
> Don't want my OpenBSD to depend on
> Linux partitions :) My personal opinion
> 
> 
> PS: grub still can be second level boot loader, 
> e.g. for Linux affiliates. Be careful with GRUB
> on Linux partition if you are not yet convinced :) 
> 
>

grub is bad, ugly, GNUish and it's a dead project since a while

"GRUB Legacy is no longer being developed. For the differences between
GRUB Legacy and GRUB 2, please visit their respective pages."

and there doesn't seem to be any progress in the grub 2 development...

besides all the uglyness, i do like the flexibility and the
network-booting capability of grub. i didn't find any similar
replacement so i still use it in some scenarios.

btw.: there are some patches for using grub with OpenBSD
http://www.berger.to/openbsd/pxegrub.html. nevertheless, use the
openbsd (pxe) bootloader or grub chainloading ;)

reyk

Reply via email to