how about the mail store then? I suppose there'll have to be some coordinated (and "thread-friendly") back-end mail store in place for these front-end mail servers (*i'm assuming simplistic load-balancing here - at the tcp level, rather than at the application level, or splitting via userid, so that the different userids are actually assigned to different mailstores).
-jf On 7/2/05, Bob Beck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I concur. mail load is ideally suited for dividing up > amongst multiple machines (with then multiple i/o busses, etc. etc.). > > I far prefer this method to the one big machine method. > > -Bob
