* poncenby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Why? OpenBSD's libc is pretty slim already. If you have need of a > > further cut-down libc, you could trim it more. > > Because I want dietlibc for a fnord installation and haven't got the > time or experience to fiddle around and get fnord to work with > anything but dietlibc. > any chance of pointing me in the right direction?
dietlibc is for Linux. So it won't work on *BSD without any porting- effort. Compile fnord without dietlibc (remove it from the Makefile) or use gatling (libowfat-cvs compiles on 3.7). I actually prefer gatling. -- Fridtjof Busse
