Fine then you should have read my email to misc@ about vmware 5. Also fixed the mpt support so this information *is* out there. Brad is right.
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 05:55:54PM -0700, Spruell, Darren-Perot wrote: > From: Brad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > From: Brad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > I'm just curious what the point of sending the dmesg was? > > > > > > > > It's not like people haven't been running OpenBSD under VMware for > > > > years now. This isn't stating anything new. > > > > > > Because its the Proper thing to do. Don't discourage thoroughness. > > > > > > DS > > > > I can look in the mailing list archives and find plenty of dmesgs from > > VMware. Posting another one doesn't do anything useful. I'm not > > discouraging thoroughness but I am discouraging pointless > > posts to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > And suppose VMWare decides to emulate different hardware/architectures in > their VMs? Suddenly, the dmesg becomes very pertinent. > > Point is, better to be swamped with too much information than too little. > You'll find that statement in the archives as well. > > DS
