Edd Barrett wrote: >> rather then trying more stupid band-aids and wuergarounds it would be >> fantastic if someone could sit down and get us a software raid >> implementation that doesn't suck and thus can be included in the regular >> kernels. > > I havent noticed anything terribly wrong with raidframe. Why do you > think it sucks? > > The only drawback with raidframe i see is that mirrors can only be 2 disks.
* huge * complex * you can't add mirroring after initial install if you weren't planning for it at the beginning. * its recovery from "events" is not graceful (i.e., long boot times). That's just a starter... (can't believe I forgot the bsd.mp case...) Nick.
