Miroslav Kubik wrote: > Han wrote: > > Vladislav Belogrudov wrote: > > > I thought it would make sence for most secure OS. One port > > > less listening the World. > > > > It's not a security problem to have an open port. It's a > > security problem to have a bad server listening to an > > open port. > > > > And since nobody knows about a problem with the X server, not > > even the people who have very deep knowledge about X and about > > security you can safely assume it's OK to have that port open > > by default. > > > > Now if you don't trust any of all those experts and you want > > to close that port for your own machine that's fine, but don't > > ask the experts to trust on your intuition while they are > > providing the OS in the first place. > > In my opinion, it is better to have it disabled as default. > Nothing is without bugs. So if we want most secure OS we should > disable this function. If you need it. Enable it.
You simply repeat the same idea, without even bothering to read what I just said. Anyway it's just your opinion. You may voice it of course but I'm glad you don't have anything to say on the matter. # Han
