> >| On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 03:52:54PM +0100, Manuel Guesdon wrote:
> >| > >| I think we already mentioned it that you will always see Ierr. The
> >| > >| question is if the box is able to forward more then 150kpps.
> >| > 
> >| > Yes that's one a the questions. We can divide it into 3 questions:
> >| > 1) is the limitation comes from hardware ?
> >| > 2) is the limitation comes from OpenBSD ?
> >| > 3) is the limitation comes from the way OpenBSD exploit hardware.
> >| > 
> >| > 1) Except if someone explain by a+b why the hardware can't forward this
> >| > rate, I'm keep thinking it can do it (otherwise I don't see reason to 
> >sell
> >| > quad 1Gbps nic).
> >| 
> >| Are you suggesting that because you have a quad-port gig nic, your box
> >| should be able to do 6 *million* packets per second? By that logic my
> >| 5-port Soekris net4801 should be able to handle 740kpps. (for reference,
> >| the net4801 does about 3kpps with 4.9)
> 
> No, I don't suggest that, I simply think it strange to have these
> kind of hardware specification (bus length and speed and bgps nic)
> [...]

It is strange that the vendors of these hardware products lie with
statistics.

You are astoundingly naive.  We simply don't need the grief of
entertaining users like you.

Reply via email to