On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 14:06:11 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >On 19/10/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> There is a legitimate use for top posting. >> Deletion and/or answer of message in 10 to 15 >seconds or less. > >Nonsense. Just because your MS Outlook does not >support or is not >configured to support bottom-posting, doesn't mean >that you should >find some invalid excuses for top-posting. > >Cheers, >Constantine.
Since I am replying to your reply, I think I maybe stand corrected. This is lame enough sitting here. It does not work as a top post. Microsoft makes it easy. Easy to do it stupid, I'm beginning to think.
