Hello! On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 01:43:03PM +0000, Christian Weisgerber wrote: >Hannah Schroeter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Use a more apt data format in your use case. Ehm correcting myself: >> According to pax(1), 100 is the limit for pathnames in the old tar >> format, while the limit for ustar is 250. For *pathnames*!. >> Perhaps you can use cpio (or pax with -x cpio). >Actually, it's the SVR4 cpio format ("sv4cpio" or the variant >"sv4crc") you want. 1024-char file/path names, 32-bit inode and >device numbers, and even reasonably portable. If the plain cpio format itself isn't up to the task, perhaps the pax manual page should document its limitations. I went by the manual page and saw no mention of restrictions there for cpio, either. Still good to know about that recommendation, I might have some use for it too. Kind regards, Hannah.