You guys aren't serious, are you?
Lambos are shiny and fast crap that gets on fire easily -almost the same
for any italian car/bike out on the market; maybe not Fiat-. And that's
just the opposite OpenBSD seeks.
VirtualBox solving a problem? Not in my world.
El 01/09/2011 11:55, Tobias Crefeld escribiC3:
Am Wed, 31 Aug 2011 14:48:56 -0400
schrieb Daniel Villarreal<yclwebmas...@gmail.com>:
I was posting to advoc...@openbsd.org, but only SPAM seems to
function on that list?
Well, for whatever reason it ended at b...@openbsd.org ...
Beside the question what kind of "encryption" your MUA is using...
http://youcanlinux.wordpress.com/my-thoughts-on-openbsd/
[..]
through, Although one canbt convert a Ford car to a Lamborghini
motorcar, you can transform your computer to a high-performance
machine.
[..]
...your comparison works in another way as well: A Lamborghini is a car
like Jaguar, etc. that you never would use as your primary
transportation tool as every repair will take a unpredictable amount of
time at specialised garages that are 300 miles away.
Your primary vehicle will be something that is reliable, commonly used
and well supported. Especially if you need it to make money with it. I
believe that one of the major disadvantages of OpenBSD is the lack of
installation support / guarantee by hardware suppliers. This could
smash your whole roll-out timetable, so our "multi purpose trucks"
will always run an Enterprise Linux.
But no doubt: Some applications like packet filtering / manipulation,
ALG or routing run pretty smart on OpenBSD. Meanwhile we circumvent
the problems caused by the lack of hardware supplier's support by
abstracting hardware dependencies with the help of virtualizing
platforms like VirtualBox (offering some OpenBSD-templates) or ProxMox
(KVM / "Other").
Regards,
Tobias.
