Marco, You're thinking of that C2 aren't you? Heh, but he wanted a network stack.
I'm thinking MS-DOS with the network stack... Alec, Why are you trolling? If this is a real project/proposal, you need a hell of a lot more help than this. On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Marco Peereboom <sl...@peereboom.us> wrote: > Windows NT 3.51 without a network stack. > > On Sep 5, 2011, at 8:55, Alec Taylor <alec.tayl...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Good evening, >> >> What's the most secure operating system? >> >> /me is thinking OpenBSD >> >> Features required: >> TCP/IP Suite with IPv4 and IPv6 (yeah, I know, big security loss by >> incorporating Internet access!) >> GUI >> Web-server (with HTTPS capabilities) >> LDAP+-Kerberos server for User auth >> CAS or similar for SSO >> Radius or (preferably) Diameter support >> Java support >> WINE compatible >> Multithreaded >> Multi-processor capable >> Wide architecture support (x86, x64, mainframes) >> >> If my project proposal is successful, I will be implementing this >> system to replace a Windows environment at one of the largest banks in >> the country. >> >> Thanks for all suggestions+advice, >> >> Alec Taylor > > -- http://www.glumbert.com/media/shift http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGvHNNOLnCk "This officer's men seem to follow him merely out of idle curiosity." -- Sandhurst officer cadet evaluation. "Securing an environment of Windows platforms from abuse - external or internal - is akin to trying to install sprinklers in a fireworks factory where smoking on the job is permitted." -- Gene Spafford learn french: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=30v_g83VHK4
