On 10/30/05, frantisek holop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > but a couple of months ago a link appeared here describing a HPN > (as in hihg performance enabled) ssh patch. i kept that mail for > a very long time because i was very much interested in the answers > of the ssh developers, but there was none. and so i assumed it must > be rubish or something. > > > so before anyone tags this mail as a trolling flamebait > (which it is not), i just would like to ask > -have others tried HPN-SSH? > -have ssh developers tried it? > -or simply, has ssh hit its performance limit and can't get any better?
my understanding is that the patch works, but it's not "right".
