> From: Claudio Jeker <cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com>
>
> Thanks for the log and tcpdumps. It seems you're the first person to try
> opaque LSA against ospfd. Can you give the following diff a spin?
> I think this will solve the problems.

Claudio,

Thanks for the patch. I've compiled this in a lab and indeed things
are indeed stable.

lab# ospfctl show neigh | grep  FULL
1.0.0.80        200 FULL/DR      00:00:37 10.1.1.80       em0       18:41:01
1.0.0.72        100 FULL/BCKUP   00:00:30 10.1.1.72       em0       18:41:0

Out of curiosity, why is the default to terminate instead of ignore
the invalid LSA?

Reply via email to