Thu, 12 Apr 2012 11:32:54 -0400 P>Q Ted Unangst <t...@tedunangst.com>: > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012, Mo Libden wrote: > > > Wow. If memory serves, rfork() availability was a feature. > > Now it is gone... Any reasons to share please? > > > > It allowed creation of interesting types of processes, > > awesome flexibility regarding share of memory space > > and/or file handle tables. > > rthreads should be awesome enough for anybody. :)
"640K ought to be enough for anybody" eh?
