On Jul 23 21:07:09, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2012-07-23, Jan Stary <h...@stare.cz> wrote: > >> On Jul 21, 2012 4:02 PM, "Jan Stary" <h...@stare.cz> wrote: > >> > >> > Is there any support present or planned for Ethernet over USB? > >> > > >> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethernet_over_USB#Treat_USB_as_an_Ethernet_network > >> > > >> > The motivation is to conenct my smartphone via USB to my workstation, > >> > thus having the phone connected to the net without either a wifi AP > >> > or using the operator's network data tarif. > > > > > > On Jul 21 16:32:31, Christiano F. Haesbaert wrote: > >> Yes see urndis > > > > My phone is Samsung GT-I5510, which is a Samsung Galaxy, > > which urndis(4) mentiones as supprted. Does someone use it > > as a urndis device? Should it report as a urndis device > > once connected via USB? I only get > > > > umass1 at uhub0 port 3 configuration 1 interface 0 "SAMSUNG Electronics > > Co., Ltd. Samsung Android USB Device" rev 2.00/4.00 addr 3 > > umass1: using SCSI over Bulk-Only scsibus4 at umass1: 2 targets, initiator 0 > > sd3 at scsibus4 targ 1 lun 0: <SAMSUNG, GT-I5510 Card, 0000> SCSI2 0/direct > > removable serial.04e8681d551065d6a9ce > > > > i.e. it only exposes itself as a umass device. > > urndis(4) should connect to this phone in -current,
Today's current/amd64 doesn't: umass1 at uhub0 port 3 configuration 1 interface 0 "SAMSUNG Electronics Co., Ltd. Samsung Android USB Device" rev 2.00/4.00 addr 3 umass1: using SCSI over Bulk-Only scsibus4 at umass1: 2 targets, initiator 0 sd3 at scsibus4 targ 1 lun 0: <SAMSUNG, GT-I5510 Card, 0000> SCSI2 0/direct removable serial.04e8681d551065d6a9ce Is someone is using a Samsung Galaxy as a urndis device, would you please share the dmesg? Note: "SAMSUNG GT-I5510" is probably not entirely the same as Samsung Galaxy S / S2" which the urndis manpage mentions. > it presents an > ethernet-like interface, normally you would run dhclient on a > computer to connect via the phone - the computer will then use the > phone for internet access via whichever method it's connected, > wifi/3g/gprs/etc). > > However....it's just a network interface, so I imagine that if you > have access to change the phone's routing table (which will probably > require the phone to be rooted) then I don't see why you couldn't > change the default route on the phone...
