On 2012-11-16, at 5:52 AM, Johnny Billquist <b...@update.uu.se> wrote:
> On 2012-11-16 12:48, Tomas Bodzar wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Hub- FreeBSD <free...@hub.org> wrote: >>> >>> Actually, according to what we are tracking at http://bsdstats.org, there >>> are currently *8*: >>> >>> PC-BSD >>> FreeBSD >>> PYC-BSD (aka Rus-BSD) >>> DesktopBSD >>> OpenBSD >>> NetBSD >>> DragonflyBSD >>> MidnightBSD >>> >> >> Tracking something like DesktopBSD which doesn't exist for quite a >> long time make statistics not much useful. MidnightBSD seems to be >> same case as last activy on mailing list last year in May, forums >> doesn't working at all so we are still on 4 core BSDs >> (Open/Net/Free/Dfly). > > I find it rather meaningless as a tracking tool for BSD in general. There is > no way something like 2BSD would ever appear there, no matter how many > systems were installed. > > And I also do happen to consider OS-X to be a BSD system. :-) I agree on that point, which is why I run it for my desktops … but until you mention it, I'd never thought of even trying to get the script to run … have to play with that this weekend and see how "out of the box" it works, if it does …