OK, now got the soultion. I moved the statement blackhole within in the options {} and now is accepted. I was trying to use it in zones, which is not recognized.
Sorry for the noise. On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 1:50 AM, Paolo Aglialoro <paol...@gmail.com> wrote: > Well, > > thanks for answer, but I still get the same problem. I tried to put > blackhole out of zone statement in the general area, but the error is still > the same: > > # grep blackhole named.conf > blackhole { spooferz; }; > # named-checkconf ./named.conf > ./named.conf:18: unknown option 'blackhole' > > I'm getting rather crazy.... might there be any difference about sparc64 > arch? > Could you please post your named.conf for reference? > > > > On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 1:07 AM, Philip Guenther <guent...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Paolo Aglialoro <paol...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > This is 5.2 on sparc64. >> > Both in BIND9 admin guide and in man named.conf the option "blackhole" >> is >> > present. >> > Nevertheless, this is the story: >> > >> > # named-checkconf -t /var/named/ >> > /etc/named.conf:111: unknown option 'blackhole' >> ... >> > Is it missing in OpenBSD implementation? Is there any way out of this? >> Like >> > adding "anyone else" to allow-query structure? >> >> No, it's not missing: >> >> # grep blackhole named.conf >> blackhole { clients; }; >> # named-checkconf ./named.conf >> # >> >> >> Philip Guenther