On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 12:20:14AM +1100, Joel Sing wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jan 2013, Eivind Evensen wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 02:33:16AM +1100, Joel Sing wrote: > > > On Thu, 3 Jan 2013, Eivind Evensen wrote: > > > > On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 07:21:08PM +1100, Joel Sing wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 31 Dec 2012, Eivind Evensen wrote: > > > > > > Hello. > > > > > > > > > > > > Trying to play around a bit with softraid using vnd reliably > > > > > > results in a panic when assembling the raid volume. I think the > > > > > > first time I tried this was around 4.9 so it's not something new. > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > FWIW this should now be rectified in -current. > > > > I tried a snapshot downloaded on 21.th > > (OpenBSD 5.2-current (GENERIC) #17: Fri Jan 18 19:42:57 MST 2013) > > which produced the same results. I waited a few days in case the snapshot > > was too old and built from sources from yesterday, still giving > > the same results. I don't need such a setup so it's not a big deal, but > > here's output and dmesg in case it may be helpful: > > Thanks for the report. For some reason I thought you had tried using softraid > crypto on a vnd and overlooked the fact that you were trying to use RAID 5 > (and now RAID 1). To clarify, RAID 0, CONCAT and CRYPTO should all now work > on top of a vnd - RAID 1, RAID 4 and RAID 5 will still break in the manner > given below (panic related to active workunits). These disciplines require > the same changes that I've made to the other three, however they're a little > more complex and time consuming. I'll try to get to them fixed soon.
I see, thanks for the explanation. Eivind.
