[*] All the above.

On 2013-02-02, at 19:23, Erling Westenvik <erling.westen...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 08:00:11PM -0600, Maximo Pech wrote:
> I'm more interested in the story of how the 5yo became openbsd obsessed.

Probably a multiple choise answer:

[ ] Because of OpenBSD's acclaimed user-friendliness?
[ ] Because of OpenBSD's large user base?
[ ] Like father, like son?

> 
> El s?bado, 2 de febrero de 2013, Chris Hettrick escribi?:
> 
>> Hi Misc,
>> 
>> I made a list of the most classical UNIX commands / utilities from section
>> one where there is only one per letter of the english alphabet (it's for my
>> OpenBSD obsessed five year old son :) ). I know that this subject is very
>> personal and steeped in tradition and history, so I was looking for your
>> opinions and suggestions.
>> A quick note about the list: some hard choices were made concerning
>> letters such as c, p, m, etc. For instance, kill(1) is not included for two
>> reasons: it is included in the shell, and it needs ps(1) to be properly
>> used (which conflicts with pwd(1) which I think is _more_ useful for a UNIX
>> beginner). mv(1) was not included because a cp(1) and rm(1) can suffice.
>> 
>> This is the list:
>> 
>> awk
>> bc
>> cp
>> date
>> echo
>> find
>> grep
>> head
>> id
>> jot
>> ksh (as a superset of sh)
>> ls
>> more
>> nc
>> od
>> pwd
>> quota
>> rm
>> sort
>> tail
>> uniq
>> vi
>> wc
>> xargs
>> yes
>> zcat
>> 
>> Any opinions, suggestions?
>> Thanks!
>> 
>> Chris

Reply via email to