On 02.03.2013 19:24, Tobias Ulmer wrote:
> Your resolution is 1600*1200*3 bytes (lets ignore whatever protocol the
> driver uses, probably not 3 byte words), so 1 full frame update, without
> the large USB overhead, means pushing out 5.5MB/s. At just 25fps that is
> 138MB/s or around 1.2Gbit/s.
> 
> Now, USB2 has a theoretical bandwidth of 480Mbit/s, DVI has 4Gbit/s
> (dedicated, with no protocol that also supports mice and stuff).  And
> DVI gets replaced by DP (8Gbit/s and more) because it can't keep up.
> 
> Even if OpenBSD was super-awesome at graphics, video and usb (which it
> clearly is not), it could not overcome the hardware limitations. Unless
> the chip itself could do video decoding in hardware, but that is clearly
> not something supported by a framebuffer driver.
> 
> So... no way is this ever going to work.
Thanks for the technical clarification.

> Your graphics card does nothing here, afaict. It's all purely done on
> the CPU. Actually I find it kind of amazing that it works at all...
Yes it is ! It is sufficient for me in many cases.

-- 
Alexis de BRUYN

Reply via email to