* Thomas Adam <tho...@xteddy.org> [2013-09-12 10:17:56 +0100]: > On 12 September 2013 06:10, Carson Chittom <car...@wistly.net> wrote: > > Zoran Kolic <zko...@sbb.rs> writes: > > > >> In fact, fvwm is in base part. > > > > A while ago, there was a message to misc from the fvwm developer about > > relicensing fvwm to allow a more recent version into base. I wonder if > > there is any status update? > > That is I. Unfortunately, FVWM cannot be relicensed. > > -- Thomas Adam
If it can't be relicensed so an up-to-date version can be included in the base distribution then is there much point in it being there at all? People can simply use the package/port to install a supported version and the base distribution can simply have cwm as its main wm.
