Alexander Hall <alexan...@beard.se> wrote: > Marc already anwered all your questions. Let me quote it. > > > Fuck off
The most brilliant answers of the experts: ------------------------ Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 19:18:03 +0200 From: Marc Espie <es...@nerim.net> To: hru...@gmail.com Cc: t...@servasoftware.com, misc@openbsd.org Subject: Re: cvsync, rsync On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 04:16:47PM +0000, hru...@gmail.com wrote: > Intentionally I left the problem generic. Is the probability near to 1? YES it is near to 1. Your way to phrase mathematical problems is BOGUS. You can't do probability without formulating a set of complete hypothesis. Your way to reason about this is BOGUS. We've been telling you THE EXACT SAME THING about those hash properties for MESSAGES by now. It seems it doesn't get through. This is either indicative of a very poor grasp of english, or of mathematical concepts, or both. So I'm going to finally stop answering your stupid stupid questions. I've got a feeling you don't "trust" those programs because you really don't understand numbers in an intuitive way. Like I said, FUD. Just because you feel insecure about numbers doesn't mean you have to try to communicate your insecurity about it to other people. ------------------------------------------------------ Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 14:36:05 -0400 From: Kenneth R Westerback <kwesterb...@rogers.com> To: hru...@gmail.com Cc: kwesterb...@rogers.com, misc@openbsd.org, h...@stare.cz Subject: Re: cvsync, rsync On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 06:18:48PM +0000, hru...@gmail.com wrote: > Kenneth R Westerback <kwesterb...@rogers.com> wrote: > > > And your endless meanderings around the pointless questions you pose > > are not welcome on the list. They certainly have NOTHING to do with > > OpenBSD. > > What you say in the last sentence is exactly what I hope. One > of my questions was: > > "This is a conjecture. Do you have a proof that the probability is so > small? For me it is difficult to accept it. Is this conjecture used > elsewhere?" > > Rodrigo. Wow. Missing the point again. Please go away. Bother some non-OpenBSD list. As with others I am torn between recommending an english-as-a-second language list, or a math-for-idiots list. OpenBSD lists provide neither service. In any case. PLEASE GO AWAY. .... Ken ----------------------- Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 20:42:03 +0200 From: Jan Stary <h...@stare.cz> To: hru...@gmail.com Subject: Re: cvsync, rsync On Sep 17 18:18:48, hru...@gmail.com wrote: > Kenneth R Westerback <kwesterb...@rogers.com> wrote: > > > And your endless meanderings around the pointless questions you pose > > are not welcome on the list. They certainly have NOTHING to do with > > OpenBSD. > > What you say in the last sentence is exactly what I hope. Why are you bothering people on an OpenBSD maling list then? > One of my questions was: > "This is a conjecture. > Do you have a proof that the probability is so small? No, it's not a conjecture. It's a property of the hash function. > For me it is difficult to accept it. That's because you don't know the first thing about it, and are immune to reason. Now please, with all due respect, fuck off. -------------------- Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 14:37:10 -0400 From: Eric Furman <ericfur...@fastmail.net> To: hru...@gmail.com Subject: Re: cvsync, rsync Begone troll On Tue, Sep 17, 2013, at 02:18 PM, hru...@gmail.com wrote: > Kenneth R Westerback <kwesterb...@rogers.com> wrote: > > > And your endless meanderings around the pointless questions you pose > > are not welcome on the list. They certainly have NOTHING to do with > > OpenBSD. > > What you say in the last sentence is exactly what I hope. One > of my questions was: > > "This is a conjecture. Do you have a proof that the probability is so > small? For me it is difficult to accept it. Is this conjecture used > elsewhere?" > > Rodrigo.
