Hello, Does pfsync currently support failover of a pf established 'reply-to'/'route-to' states when Carp failover happens?
I`ve noticed that states created with pf rules that contains 'reply-to'/'route-to', after switching to backup server are using default route/routing table instead of routes that were supplied in 'reply-to'/'route-to' pf rules. I know you were working around it from: http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=128940646028112&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=126403343102126&w=2 Do you plan to include syncing 'reply-to'/'route-to' information in pf states in near future? Regards. Dariusz Binkul
