Ok, thanks for all the replies. Im waiting to this situation appears to send to you the output of those commands.
Thanks and regards Saludos.- Leonardo Santagostini <http://ar.linkedin.com/in/santagostini> 2013/11/18 mxb <m...@alumni.chalmers.se> > > Output for > > 'pfctl -si', 'pfctl -sm' and 'sysctl -a|grep net.inet.ip.ifqâ would be hie > to see. > > //mxb > > > On 18 nov 2013, at 04:20, Leonardo Santagostini <lsantagost...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Sorry, looking more detailed at the logs i found this: > > /var/log/daemon > Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[13984]: fatal: relay_connect: no > connection in flight > Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[22615]: pfe exiting, pid 22615 > Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[31674]: hce exiting, pid 31674 > Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[9082]: relay exiting, pid 9082 > Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[701]: relay exiting, pid 701 > Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[21358]: parent terminating, pid > 21358 > Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[24886]: relay exiting, pid 24886 > Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[21395]: relay exiting, pid 21395 > Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[13155]: relay exiting, pid 13155 > Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[20557]: relay exiting, pid 20557 > Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[14903]: relay exiting, pid 14903 > Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[10686]: relay exiting, pid 10686 > Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[17355]: relay exiting, pid 17355 > Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[26908]: relay exiting, pid 26908 > Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[6551]: relay exiting, pid 6551 > Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[16649]: relay exiting, pid 16649 > Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[2567]: relay exiting, pid 2567 > Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[3159]: relay exiting, pid 3159 > > > /var/log/messages > Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[13984]: fatal: relay_connect: no > connection in flight > > > Regards > > Saludos.- > Leonardo Santagostini > > <http://ar.linkedin.com/in/santagostini> > > > > > > 2013/11/18 Leonardo Santagostini <lsantagost...@gmail.com> > >> Hello everybody, i still having some issues whit relayd. >> >> Nov 17 21:01:56 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[4252]: relay relay4, session 75 >> (1 active), 0, 190.51.90.22 -> :0, buffer event timeout >> Nov 17 21:01:57 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[12715]: relay relay4, session 97 >> (4 active), 0, 190.49.60.30 -> :0, buffer event timeout >> Nov 17 21:01:58 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[4781]: relay relay4, session 142 >> (3 active), 0, 190.188.18.202 -> :0, buffer event timeout >> Nov 17 21:02:03 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[25332]: relay relay4, session 28 >> (1 active), 0, 181.29.46.36 -> :0, hard timeout >> Nov 17 21:02:03 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[12715]: relay relay4, session 55 >> (3 active), 0, 108.36.150.233 -> :0, hard timeout >> Nov 17 21:02:03 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[18695]: relay relay4, session 67 >> (3 active), 0, 31.221.13.210 -> :0, hard timeout >> Nov 17 21:02:03 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[13096]: relay relay5, session 73 >> (3 active), 0, 190.195.118.49 -> :0, hard timeout >> Nov 17 21:02:03 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[31990]: relay relay4, session 25 >> (1 active), 0, 186.188.178.215 -> :0, hard timeout >> Nov 17 21:02:03 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[4781]: relay relay4, session 144 >> (7 active), 0, 31.221.13.210 -> :0, hard timeout >> Nov 17 21:02:03 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[23317]: relay relay2, session 55 >> (5 active), 0, 181.109.7.31 -> :0, hard timeout >> Nov 17 21:02:03 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[22942]: relay relay4, session 93 >> (2 active), 0, 31.221.13.210 -> :0, hard timeout >> Nov 17 21:02:03 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[13862]: relay relay4, session 80 >> (3 active), 0, 190.111.231.50 -> :0, hard timeout >> Nov 17 21:02:06 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[19770]: relay relay4, session 92 >> (1 active), 0, 75.70.87.158 -> :0, buffer event timeout >> Nov 17 21:02:08 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[23317]: relay relay4, session >> 131 (5 active), 0, 190.113.173.36 -> :0, buffer event timeout >> Nov 17 21:02:11 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[10590]: relay relay4, session >> 103 (9 active), 0, 186.137.241.254 -> :0, buffer event timeout >> Nov 17 21:02:15 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[23317]: relay relay4, session >> 143 (2 active), 0, 24.232.115.134 -> :0, buffer event timeout >> Nov 17 21:02:16 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[12715]: relay relay4, session >> 101 (7 active), 0, 108.87.58.21 -> :0, buffer event timeout >> Nov 17 21:02:16 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[12715]: relay relay4, session >> 102 (6 active), 0, 108.87.58.21 -> :0, buffer event timeout >> Nov 17 21:02:16 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[10590]: relay relay5, session >> 142 (13 active), 0, 190.195.118.49 -> 172.19.224.73:80<http://172.19.224.73/>, >> no method >> Nov 17 21:02:16 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[10590]: relay relay4, session >> 114 (12 active), 0, 190.49.11.36 -> :0, buffer event timeout >> Nov 17 21:02:16 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[12715]: relay relay4, session >> 104 (5 active), 0, 190.49.11.36 -> :0, buffer event timeout >> Nov 17 21:02:17 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[10590]: relay relay4, session >> 120 (10 active), 0, 189.237.152.81 -> :0, buffer event timeout >> Nov 17 21:02:17 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[31990]: relay relay4, session >> 117 (5 active), 0, 189.237.152.81 -> :0, buffer event timeout >> Nov 17 21:02:17 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[10590]: relay relay5, session >> 144 (9 active), 0, 190.195.118.49 -> 172.19.224.71:80<http://172.19.224.71/>, >> no method >> Nov 17 21:02:17 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[10590]: relay relay5, session >> 145 (9 active), 0, 190.195.118.49 -> 172.19.224.70:80<http://172.19.224.70/>, >> no method >> Nov 17 21:02:19 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[30656]: relay relay4, session >> 126 (4 active), 0, 190.220.108.107 -> :0, buffer event timeout >> Nov 17 21:02:22 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[19770]: relay relay4, session >> 103 (1 active), 0, 189.149.155.136 -> :0, buffer event timeout >> Nov 17 21:02:25 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[18695]: relay relay4, session 79 >> (3 active), 0, 181.167.177.45 -> :0, buffer event timeout >> Nov 17 21:02:28 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[12715]: relay relay4, session >> 109 (4 active), 0, 190.18.27.4 -> :0, buffer event timeout >> Nov 17 21:02:30 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[12715]: relay relay4, session >> 112 (3 active), 0, 181.21.154.28 -> :0, buffer event timeout >> >> Here is my config >> >> dmesg: http://pastebin.com/fLU8qaTd >> relayd.conf: http://pastebin.com/Nn1VYRxQ >> pf.conf: http://pastebin.com/HcQchkgP >> /etc/hostname.carp0: http://pastebin.com/wyccT20r >> /etc/hostname.em1: http://pastebin.com/MQq9nExL >> /etc/sysctl.conf: http://pastebin.com/QrkwLgWN >> >> Anybody can "enligth me" ? >> >> Thank you in advance, best regards >> >> Saludos.- >> Leonardo Santagostini >> >> <http://ar.linkedin.com/in/santagostini> >> >> >> >> >> >> 2013/11/14 Leonardo Santagostini <lsantagost...@gmail.com> >> >>> Hello Andy. Actually i proved flushing pf rules, tables and counters >>> with no luck. >>> >>> But after restart relayd things come to work as expected. >>> >>> Thanks, Leonardo >>> El nov 14, 2013 8:15 p.m., "mxb" <m...@alumni.chalmers.se> escribió: >>> >>> No, >>>> it is number of currently active sessions for this particular relay. >>>> Eg. 502 âusers". >>>> >>>> On 14 nov 2013, at 21:59, Andy Lemin <a...@brandwatch.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, as a complete guess (not used relayd yet let alone DSR) a 502 >>>> sounds like >>>> an error return from nginx/apache etc. could be a direct server return >>>> issue >>>> causing the TCP three way handshake to not be completing properly >>>> between the >>>> endpoints, even though a 502 is usually server side issue.. I'd try >>>> removing >>>> the 'in' or 'out' direction from the rules.
