double (or even better long double) would be a better underlying type for 
time_t than long long.

Programs that are using time_t properly would not notice the difference. 
Programs that very
incorrect would get complete garbage for a result, and thus be easier to notice 
and correct.

Using double for time_t would allow a time_t value to be used as a time stamp 
for events separated
by  milliseconds. Using long double for time_t would allow time_t to be used as 
time stamps to record
time starts and finish crossing an atom. I am sure the CERN would like it.

It time_t is a double. It also makes sense for clock_t to be a double in the 
same units.

Reply via email to