On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 7:32 PM, I wrote:
> It's a bug.  The situation should be permitted to get into that state
> but obviously it has gotten then.

Hmm, I'd like to blame the incoherency of that on autocorrect and
mental shorthands, but I don't think that's legit.

The kernel should *not* let the uvm memory situation get into that
state, but obviously it has gotten there.


Philip Guenther

Reply via email to