On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 04:03:08PM +0000, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 01, 2014 at 09:34:10PM +0100, Denis Fondras wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > I've just discovered that OpenBSD vmstat(8) can use wait and count
> > arguments without using -c/-w. Here is a small patch to mention this
> > usage in the manual :
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Denis
> > 
> > --- vmstat.8.orig       Sun Feb 23 15:50:17 2014
> > +++ vmstat.8    Sun Feb 23 15:54:24 2014
> > @@ -45,6 +45,11 @@
> >  .Op Fl N Ar system
> >  .Op Fl w Ar wait
> >  .Op Ar disk ...
> > +.Nm vmstat
> > +.Op Ar wait Op Ar count
> > +.Op Fl M Ar core
> > +.Op Fl N Ar system
> > +.Op Ar disk ...
> >  .Sh DESCRIPTION
> >  .Nm
> >  reports certain kernel statistics kept about process, virtual memory,
> > 
> 
> hi. i don;t much like adding another synopsis for this. it's just makes
> it more complicated, without adding much.
> 
> i note usage() and SYNOPSIS are already out of sync here ;( i had no
> idea we had split synopsis up this way.
> 
> i guess, properly, we should somehow show stuff like: [[-c] count]
> or just reword the description of the options to say under which
> circumstances it's optional.
> 
> and looking at BUGS:
> 
>      This manual page lacks an incredible amount of detail.
> 
> we could just paste this into all our pages ;)
> 
> before doing anything, i'd like to ask if anyone knows of a reason why
> we wouldn;t document this, or the history of when this was added?
> 
> i'll think on it a bit more.
> 
> jmc

no one has replied, so i'll just say i don;t want to do this. i already
dislike that we've split SYNOPSIS into two forms (where neither freebsd or
netbsd have), and i don;t see a third form adding much. and i don;t see
a way to add this to SYNOPSIS correctly without adding a third form ;)

i think trying to document it is just going to make for more confusing
text.

think of it as a trick that only you know!

sorry,
jmc

Reply via email to