I was reading stuff in misc@ about OpenSSL broken things. I see people from OpenBSD started LibreSSL project and they are forking OpenSSL and remove the bad code. This is past, but I see more and more lesions are discovered. It may be a stupid question, but having all these, isn't more efficient to start LibreSSL from zero? I know OpenBSD is short on staff, but the effort to start from zero code could be less than fix the old code, I think. Or could it be that the OpenSSL code is not so broken? Can someone post here a percent of "usable" code?
Thanks.
