On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 02:28:47PM -0500, Marc Suttle wrote: > I understand we can always use alternatives to this setup. In an > enterprise env. you would probably never use one of these anyway. It just > seems that there is quite a bit of development on the FreeBSD side and > why duplicate efforts if an NDA would not be needed for a stack port? This > would allow OpenBSD to support more wireless chipsets especially on laptop > and home/smb firewalls.
A port of the FreeBSD driver won't magically be free of bugs so why would replacing the existing driver be any easier than hunting down remaining bugs in the existing driver code?
