On Thu, 23 Oct 2014 21:24:56 +0000 (UTC), Stuart Henderson wrote: >On 2014-10-23, Rod Whitworth <glis...@witworx.com> wrote: >> Years ago I bought a Minitar VoIP ATA and it was great. >> >> Then SWMBO wanted one too and I set up siproxd which mostly worked. >> >> Then I go two global IPs and put one ATA/Phone on each. Perfect! No Siproxd! >> >> Now I am about to need those 2 IPs. >> >> Neither phone needs to recieve incoming calls. >> >> Anybody using some of the more recent additions inthe Telephony ports? >> >> Ones to avoid or ones to love? >> >> Thanx,
>I would first try it with standard NAT. It depends on the exact setup >on both sides, but it's common for VoIP providers these days to handle >various NAT based configurations in their border controllers or SIP >servers - the first troubleshooting step from their side would often >be to *disable* any "nat helpers". >If that's no good, try restricting each ATA/phone to a different RTP >port range and port-forward them. None of the STUN etc that have arrived, since I last looked, any good? Thanx. *** NOTE *** Please DO NOT CC me. I <am> subscribed to the list. Mail to the sender address that does not originate at the list server is tarpitted. The reply-to: address is provided for those who feel compelled to reply off list. Thankyou. Rod/ --- This life is not the real thing. It is not even in Beta. If it was, then OpenBSD would already have a man page for it.
