From owner-misc+m143...@openbsd.org  Sun Oct 26 22:22:57 2014
        X-Original-To: mayur...@devio.us
        Delivered-To: mayur...@devio.us
        X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at devio.us
        Authentication-Results: wolfman.devio.us (amavisd-new);
                dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been 
altered)"
                header.d=gmail.com
        DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; 
s=20120113; 
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject 
:from:to:content-type; bh=GC1Vko0XAF6MuhMIbP8y5QLmaRAvLR5H0N6fPxvMr4M=; 
b=i/jfX6mzyrvK45i7yXEvlqGgLlLU5r31gpaARg1avnJcviDDmRMjJV9qEp0cbZZsmX 
4veHMISAhNAM2ABChH5m84wSVqkmAZxmffl8a3Xj7fnWDSWboSWvPtWpoZwVp6FKYT3a 
6v1XuIn+WMkdTKjTwb9jSYRzg88HnkrkGxlQMAuSY5uB6MqsO0jqGLyxuO604UgKnfdw 
cFrZfPjyAiiHt5VVO/7YMRlWzq/6GAyCFRyA9LcSv170KPnNIi5dPqLASNGrwvVqXUsZ 
dW0kTF8qxmqnJxeYYxm0BH4s7KPMZ8+IvN1zA9RcjXnmIGtEEi94pCR5nbj9OwwcG3xJ g4dw==
        MIME-Version: 1.0
        X-Received: by 10.202.185.139 with SMTP id 
j133mr16754802oif.25.1414376481358; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 19:21:21 -0700 (PDT)
        References: <20141027005634.3416a1b5...@wolfman.devio.us>
        X-Google-Sender-Auth: _qqD-ym4zFJb3ZiF5l9BkvwN5DM
        Subject: Re: 64-bit amd64 : actual memory limitations?
        From: =?UTF-8?Q?Martin_Schr=C3=B6der?= <mar...@oneiros.de>
        To: OpenBSD general usage list <misc@openbsd.org>
        Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
        List-Help: <mailto:majord...@openbsd.org?body=help>
        List-ID: <misc.openbsd.org>
        List-Owner: <mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org>
        List-Post: <mailto:misc@openbsd.org>
        List-Subscribe: <mailto:majord...@openbsd.org?body=sub%20misc>
        List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majord...@openbsd.org?body=unsub%20misc>
        X-Loop: misc@openbsd.org
        Precedence: list
        Sender: owner-m...@openbsd.org

        2014-10-27 1:56 GMT+01:00 Mayuresh Kathe <mayur...@devio.us>:
        > if the intended application actually requires larger memory to be
        > accessible, would it be better to go for a non-x86-64 64-bit hardware?

        256TB (2^48) should be good enough till 2020.


it is for a lot of records (data-sets) to held in memory instead
of approaching the disk every time that data is requested.
the use-case is primarily for financial system, but, will also
hold 'gis' data going forward.
the owner of the system isn't rich enough to afford an 'ibm'
mainframe, hence a unix based system written in c89 under openbsd.
i am just the adviser/consultant. :)

Reply via email to