Thank you, Rafael. I never took the time to read the appropriate RFC,
and was used to the way pretty much everybody misuses this header then!

Just as a random example (retrieved minutes ago):

$ curl -I http://arxiv.org/abs/1008.0017
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Set-Cookie: arxiv.web=R2323986704; path=/
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2014 17:24:49 GMT
Server: Apache
ETag: "Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:21:22 GMT"
Set-Cookie: browser=212.145.95.239.1416677089941516; path=/;
max-age=946080000; domain=.arxiv.org
Last-Modified: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:21:22 GMT
Vary: Accept-Encoding,User-Agent
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8

I'm sorry, everybody.

Cheers,

Ezequiel

On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 6:09 PM, Rafael Neves <rafaelne...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Ezequiel Garzón
> <garzon.luc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Greetings! I'm using the original 5.6 release of OpenBSD, and httpd is
>> using for the "Date" HTTP header the access time of the file instead of
>> the modification time. Here are two consecutive requests:
>>
>> $ curl -I eze
>> HTTP/1.1 200 OK
>> Connection: keep-alive
>> Content-Length: 1
>> Content-Type: text/html
>> Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2014 16:48:24 GMT
>> Server: OpenBSD httpd
>>
>> $ curl -I eze
>> HTTP/1.1 200 OK
>> Connection: keep-alive
>> Content-Length: 1
>> Content-Type: text/html
>> Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2014 16:48:29 GMT
>> Server: OpenBSD httpd
>>
>> Has this been reported? Should I use sendbug(1)?
>>
>
> Hi,
>
> Sorry, but I think the code is correct.
> The HTTP/1.1. standard (RFC 7231) says in Section 7.1.1.2. that:
> "The "Date" header field represents the date and time at which the
>
>    message was originated, having the same semantics as the Origination
>    Date Field (orig-date) defined in Section 3.6.1 of [RFC5322].  The
>    field value is an HTTP-date, as defined in Section 7.1.1.1.
>
>      Date = HTTP-date
>
>    An example is
>
>      Date: Tue, 15 Nov 1994 08:12:31 GMT
>
>    When a Date header field is generated, the sender SHOULD generate its
>    field value as the best available approximation of the date and time
>    of message generation.  In theory, the date ought to represent the
>    moment just before the payload is generated.  In practice, the date
>    can be generated at any time during message origination.
>
>    An origin server MUST NOT send a Date header field if it does not
>    have a clock capable of providing a reasonable approximation of the
>    current instance in Coordinated Universal Time.  An origin server MAY
>    send a Date header field if the response is in the 1xx
>    (Informational) or 5xx (Server Error) class of status codes.  An
>    origin server MUST send a Date header field in all other cases."
>
> Regards,
> Rafael

Reply via email to