On Thu, 01 Jan 2015 09:37:24 -0700 Theo de Raadt <dera...@cvs.openbsd.org> wrote:
> And who are you, and what you have you done to test and then prove > your thesis? > Absolutely nothing, I must assume. Your assumption is wrong. I am working with my colleagues from 2f30 on the "morpheus"-project[0] (including package-manager) and we have a set of static binary-packages[1] already ready for use. > (BTW, your argument is weak and would be stronger if you tied it into > the faked moonlandings). I know you as a rude person and like your humour, but your response contains no argument against the points I have given. I'm not saying that in an arrogant way (maybe I'm getting this whole deal completely wrong) and wanted to give some food for thought for the future. The OpenBSD-security-focus paid off. It wasn't the fastest system 10 years ago and isn't today, but when it made a difference in the past, security is more important today than speed, given how rapidly hardware is developing. I see the same issue here: How long do we really want to waste our time on this cruft and develop libraries with the wrong concept in our heads when dynamic linking is apparently becoming more and more irrelevant? Cheers FRIGN [0]: http://morpheus.2f30.org/ [1]: http://morpheus.2f30.org/0.0/packages/x86_64/ -- FRIGN <d...@frign.de>
