Please ignore/delete this.

The SMTP server I was using was initially blocked, and thanks to the
list owner, it is now fixed. As a result, this message may have been
backlocked and sent.

It is essentially a duplicate of another message, which has received
reasonable replies.

On Mon, 8 Jun 2015 04:04:57 +1000
bytevolc...@safe-mail.net wrote:

> Hello all,
> 
> I noticed on http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#BldGetSrc that
> there is information about preloading the tree, but does not mention
> that getting to -current requires -rHEAD at least the first time using
> 'cvs update' after pre-loading the tree with the source files from the
> last release.
> 
> I discovered (the semi-hard way) that to get to -current, you need
> -rHEAD to be specified in the command line. This is after
> pre-loading the tree, because the (src/sys/xenocara).tar.gz files all
> have a check out of OPENBSD_5_7 (or whatever -stable release), frozen
> to that point at the time of releasing. Running "cvs up" simply gets
> me to the latest -stable.
> 
> My .cvsrc (between the hyphen lines):
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> # $OpenBSD: dot.cvsrc,v 1.1 2013/04/01 16:55:26 espie Exp $
> #
> cvs -q -danon...@anoncvs.au.openbsd.org:/cvs
> diff -up
> update -Pd
> checkout -P
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> It seems the (src/sys/xenocara).tar.gz files are not
> in the "snapshots" directory of any of the FTP mirrors I've seen.
> 
> I am willing to write a patch for this, but I want to ensure:
> 
> 1. I am not missing anything hidden somewhere in another FAQ.
> 2. There are no mirrors which have the (src/sys/xenocara).tar.gz files
> in their /pub/OpenBSD/snapshots directory.
> 3. That there is no other CVS command magic that I have missed, that
> may have been covered by the FAQ.
> 4. That there are no other reasons not to document this information.
> 
> I will appreciate input from users and devs alike.

Reply via email to