Gerald Hanuer [ghanuer497...@gmail.com] wrote: > Hello misc@, > > Native UEFI goes in tree. > http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvs&m=144115942223734&w=2 > <http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvs&m=144115942223734&w=2>. > Great work all. > > So what might the future hold for UEFI Secure Boot. >
So, the tree won't develop support for this standard until UEFI systems require it. Alternately, if someone writes it ahead of time, maybe that will be useful. (Useful in making it easier to boot OpenBSD without disabling secure boot in your BIOS, or useful in allowing a vendor to lock their proprietary hardware to their own signed openBSD loader, etc...) Since the purpose of Secure Boot provide little to no benefit to users (in fact quite the opposite), the question becomes.... why? Chris
