On 01/10/2015 10:48, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > Hello, > > On 30/09/15(Wed) 18:19, Daniel Gillen wrote: >> [...] >> inet 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 NONE \ >> pppoedev vlan35 \ >> authproto pap \ >> authname "<user>@vo.lu" \ >> authkey "<password>" >> dest 0.0.0.1 >> inet6 autoconf >> !/sbin/route add 0.0.0.0/0 -ifp pppoe0 0.0.0.1 >> !/sbin/route add ::/0 -ifp pppoe0 fe80:: >> >> As you can see, it get my IPv6 address trough autoconfiguration. >> >> After my pppoe reconnected again, I saw the following in ifconfig: > > What do you mean by "reconnected again" ?
The connection was dropped (LCP keepalive timeout) and PPPoE established a new connection once (I would suspect) PPPoE was available again. > >> pppoe0: flags=208851<UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST,AUTOCONF6> >> mtu 1492 >> priority: 0 >> dev: vlan35 state: session >> sid: 0x44e PADI retries: 8 PADR retries: 0 time: 13:20:45 >> sppp: phase network authproto pap authname "<user>@vo.lu" >> groups: pppoe egress >> status: active >> inet6 fe80::XX:XX:XX:6c3a%pppoe0 -> prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x8 >> inet6 2001:XX:XX:6f3:XX:XX:XX:6c3a -> prefixlen 64 autoconf >> pltime 556434 vltime 2543634 >> [...] >> inet6 2001:XX:XX:6f3:XX:XX:XX:87b2 -> prefixlen 64 autoconf >> autoconfprivacy pltime 1835 vltime 520374 >> inet 85.XX.XX.XX --> 80.XX.XX.XX netmask 0xffffffff >> inet6 2001:XX:XX:7c5:XX:XX:XX:6c3a -> prefixlen 64 autoconf >> pltime 604755 vltime 2591955 >> inet6 2001:XX:XX:7c5:XX:XX:XX:30c -> prefixlen 64 autoconf >> autoconfprivacy pltime 37915 vltime 556755 >> >> I got the new 2001:XX:XX:7c5::/64 prefix after the reconnect and OpenBSD >> added it to my interface. >> >> But it didn't remove the now invalid and no longer working >> 2001:XX:XX:6f3::/64 prefix addresses which caused quite some issues as >> my NAT was still using that address for part of the connections. >> >> Shouldn't those be removed as soon as their prefix is no longer valid? >> Or at least all be deprecated? > > If this happens again could you include the output of "# ndp -p", > "# route -n show -inet6" and "# ndp -r" in your report? > > Thanks, > Martin > Sure, will try this evening to reproduce it somehow and then send you the output. Thx Daniel
