On a related subject and please forgive any ignorance on my part, how
would the interrupt load compare, between a multi-port NIC and the same
number of ports via individual single port NICs?

For example, a firewall with one WAN port and three LAN ports. One LAN
(and of course the WAN port) port would see 'heavier' use for a family's
worth of surfing, another would be a DMZ (WAN -> DMZ only) and the last
would be a highly restricted and far less used 'other' route into the
DMZ, but only from the LAN side and NOT the WAN side.

Traffic would ultimately be bottle-necked on the WAN side, with an
8Mbit/384Kbit DSL connection with a little AltQ if and when it is
required.

Regards,

Craig

On Sun, 2006-01-01 at 16:21 -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> > Can anyone recommend a good multi-port NIC card e.g. 4-port, that works
> > OK on OpenBSD with a good source supplier.  
> 
> 
> This question was debated a few times in the archive already. So, far 
> there isn't one great card that works very well that still available to 
> purchase new these days. SK based were best, but not available anymore. 
> Intel have the Pro 1000MT, but you need to run the bsd.mp to not get 
> overwhelm by interrupts even on a single processor server. That card 
> works, but not as well as it should really! I would just OK with bsd.mp, 
> but not under very heavy load, but will do what you want for lower 
> demanding setup as long as you DO run the bsd.mp kernel.
> 
> So, far I haven't found one that is still available to purchase new 
> these days and will provide the same efficiency as older cards were able 
> to do! (:< Very sad but true!
> 
> I sure hope this change soon, but that's where we are now, at a minimum, 
> that's where I am anyway.
> 
> Daniel

Reply via email to