> # ln -s httpd httpd2 > > That's a terrible name. The next admin coming along will have no
Duh, I was just making a point. > clue what this second httpd is needed for. As I said, I thing it'd be a worthful addition to the doc indeed. However I don't think this should go into rcctl. "I should document that" is what I wrote iirc; and I will. httpd is not a good example anyway. Something like snmpd might. Please give me a couple of days and I'll send a diff. Thanks. -- Antoine
