lilit-aibolit [lilit-aibo...@mail.ru] wrote: > Thank you. This is definitely the case then. > I didn't know that fsck could produce fake errors while running on mounted > fs.
fsck requires exclusive control of the underlying disk partition. When the partition is mounted, the kernel shares control. fsck + the kernel is not yet designed to work properly. In the future we might have some background fsck support for ffs (if someone works on it!!)
