On Mar 12 16:36:37, rob...@peichaer.org wrote: > On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 04:57:04PM +0100, hans wrote: > > Has the attitude towards /etc/hosts changed again? > > After a fresh install of current/i386, > > > > 127.0.0.1 localhost > > ::1 localhost > > 192.168.22.4 www.stare.cz www > > > > The first two I would expect. > > The last one was assigned to me via DHCP during install; > > I am changing the network configuration now (to another, > > static IP address), and removing it from /etc/hosts; > > but it's easy to have a stale DHCP address > > assigned during install left in /etc/hosts. > > > > I believe it was discussed on the list before, > > and the decision was not to do this. > > Has the rationale changed? > > > > Jan > > You're probably referring to this commit from 2 years ago and since then > nothing changed with respect to adding static entries to /etc/hosts. > > revision 1.682 > date: 2013/07/21 22:06:51; author: halex; state: Exp; lines: +1 -6; > stop adding static entries to /etc/hosts for dynamic ip addresses > > "do it NOW" deraadt@
Yes, that's what I was referring to; thanks. This is a fresh install, and I sure didn't put it there myself. How could this entry ended up in my /etc/hosts ? The file /etc/hosts is in the Attic since Fri Sep 5 07:22:29 2014 http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/etc/Attic/hosts The remove message says Make the installer create the /etc/hosts template. While here, re-add a missing 'echo' from install.sh. Could it be where it got back? Jan
