Also, when I manually create a message (telnet to port 25) to a 5.9 host, a GREY entry is created, but not "published"
spamd_black=NO spamd_flags="-h <FQDN> -n \"Sendmail 8.11.4/8.11.1\" -v -w1 -y bge1 -Y bge1" spamlogd_flags="-I -i lo0" where bge1 is the interface to the internal network 2016-09-05 17:26 GMT+02:00 Kasper Haitsma <kaspe...@mailnull.com>: > Does anyone have an explanation for this? > even with pf off (pf -F all), spamd-sync packages arrive at the 5.9 > box, but no GREY entries are added to spamdb > However WHITE entries are added.. > > Help is appreciated > > 2016-08-29 15:49 GMT+02:00 Kasper Haitsma <kaspe...@mailnull.com>: >> Thanks Peter for responding. >> >> The logging goes to it's own file (/var/log/spamd.log) >> Indeed entries are written there for various events. >> now I see GREY and WHITE records added nicely in the 5.0 spamdb. >> they are syncing between each other, and the syncpackages seem to be >> received by the 5.9 nodes but the 5.9 nodes do not register these records in >> spamdb >> - any idea why? >> - any idea how to troubleshoot? >> >> root@<5.9-1> ~# tcpdump -i bge1 port 8025 >> tcpdump: listening on bge1, link-type EN10MB >> 15:44:21.056732 <5.0-1>.spamd-sync > <5.9-1>.spamd-sync: udp 164 >> 15:44:22.679540 <5.0-1>.spamd-sync > <5.9-1>.spamd-sync: udp 132 >> 15:44:23.453386 <5.0-1>.spamd-sync > <5.9-1>.spamd-sync: udp 132 >> 15:44:23.804945 <5.0-1>.spamd-sync > <5.9-1>.spamd-sync: udp 148 >> 15:44:24.242281 <5.0-1>.spamd-sync > <5.9-1>.spamd-sync: udp 132 >> >> ^C >> 2475 packets received by filter >> 0 packets dropped by kernel >> root@<5.9-1> ~# >> >> thanks
