Daniel Ouellet([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2006.01.11 23:51:00 -0500: > Martin Schrvder wrote: > >On 2006-01-11 16:18:13 -0500, Peter Landry wrote: > >>Maybe I'm misreading the situation -- but won't this just give Open > >>projects an even better chance to outpace closed system not subject to > >>the same reviews in terms of security and reliability? > > > >These are automated auditings; the closed system providers can > >simply buy the tools for these auditings. One hopes that they > >do. > > > Ya.. Try to picture that. You would see Microsoft using tools design for > open source project on what they call their flag ship wonderful OS
I guess you mean "designed for open source project" .. what does that mean? I don't think coverity designed their products for "open source projects" .. cheers, teemu -- "Every man takes the limits of his own field of vision for the limits of the world." - Schopenhauer [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature]
