Thanks for the clarification. Actually llfuse is needed by S3QL (http://www.rath.org/s3ql-docs/about.html). I am considering migration to OpenBSD but this is blocker for now.
Do anyone know similar project that runs on OpenBSD? (needed options are: Immutable Trees, Copy-on-Write and Encryption) _ Zbyszek Żółkiewski > Wiadomość napisana przez Stefan Sperling <s...@stsp.name> w dniu 25.10.2017, > o godz. 12:01: > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 07:46:29PM +0200, Zbyszek Żółkiewski wrote: >> Hi, >> >> llfuse requires FUSE 2.9.0 or newer, i think OpenBSD uses 2.6, am I right? >> >> thanks, > > Yes, OpenBSD's API declares version 2.6. But it's not the same implementation > as on Linux. I don't know if even 2.6 support can be considered complete. > > Since llfuse seems to be a Python wrapper for fuse, it probably requires > a larger subset of the fuse API than most other fuse consumers. > > So what you're asking for requires a complete API and llfuse audit just > to document requirements, and then implementations of any missing APIs > in libfuse and/or the kernel. > That's quite a big project. The answer for now will probably be: > If you invest time and work into it, it might happen. Otherwise, no. > > More help on fuse support would certainly be welcome, I think. > It has not been actively maintained for some time.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
