* Joachim Schipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-01-26 15:26]: > You might want to read a little about the recent polemic surrounding > securelevels. Basically, they work, but files that are supposed to be > unchangeable can be made inaccessible by (transparently?) mounting a > filesystem on top. This was fixed in, for instance, NetBSD by > disallowing mounts;
"fixed"? gimme a break. disallowing mounts at securelevel 2 fixes exactly what? nothing, since anybody runs securelevel 1 anyway, and there nothing is "fixed". lokk at the restrictions in securelevel 2. it's just not an option. this non-issue is not fixable. -- BS Web Services, http://www.bsws.de/ OpenBSD-based Webhosting, Mail Services, Managed Servers, ... Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
